De: Rik Panganiban <rikp@earthlink.net>
Date: Ven 7 oct 2005 19:37:02 Europe/Paris
À: plenary@wsis-cs.org
Objet: Rép : [WSIS CS-Plenary] Speakers for the Summit / my position
on nominations from Tunisia
Répondre à: plenary@wsis-cs.org
[Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire
list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for
specific people]
Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic
translation of this message!
_______________________________________
Robert,
Thanks for clarifying your position.
The Selection Committee is finalizing its list, based on all the
nominations from the various CS groupings, caucuses, working groups,
etc. We will of course take all the committee members views into
account and will be circulating our final recommendations to the ITU
and to this Plenary shortly.
Rik Panganiban
On Oct 7, 2005, at 1:17 PM, Robert Guerra wrote:
[Please note that by using 'REPLY', your response goes to the entire
list. Kindly use individual addresses for responses intended for
specific people]
Click http://wsis.funredes.org/plenary/ to access automatic
translation of this message!
_______________________________________
With the help of Rik and others, the speakers nominating group is
working hard to advance the work done in geneva to ready a list for
the ITU. Numerous exchanges have taken place so far, which is great.
In the spirit of transparency and openness, i thought it best to
share my position (as focal point on the CSB for North America &
Europe) on and about nominations from Tunisia with the plenary list.
My position is as follows....
To be honest, the inclusion of Tunisians as proposed speakers at the
summit makes be personally shake in disbelief. The names proposed
(from Tunisia) are not high enough level persons to speak at the
plenary sessions. The caucus they represent are problematic ones,
ones which - many, myself included - believe are clearly infiltrated
by the tunisian government .
There far better, and much less problematic speakers that MUST be
considered in their place. As a point of principle, if we are going
to consider tunisians for rountables then we SHOULD also give an
equal chance to "independent" civil society from the country. If that
is not possible, then , there is no equal opportunity - no consensus,
and as such the safest course of action would be to not recommend
any Tunisians at all to the ITU.
As you might imagine, this is a point of principle for me. I am
passionate about this. There needs to be openness and transparency
about this - very - sensitive issue.
Recommendation: remove all Tunisian names all together. If this group
recommends one Tunisian name vs. another, we will be lead into a
dogfight we can not win. It's a political issue - let the ITU deal
with it.
Alternatives: no doubt there are other names from other countries
that are not only "less problematic" but, are higher level and
involved in information society activities and/or initiatives at a
higher level than the Tunisian nominees.
--
Robert Guerra <rguerra@privaterra.org>
Director, Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR)
WSIS Civil Society Bureau, Focal Point for North America & Europe
Tel +1 416 893 0377 Fax +1 416 893 0374
===============================================
RIK PANGANIBAN Communications Coordinator
Conference of NGOs in Consultative Relationship with the United
Nations (CONGO)
web: http://www.ngocongo.org
email: rik.panganiban@ngocongo.org
mobile: (+1) 917-710-5524
* Information on the WSIS at http://www.ngocongo.org/wsis
* Information on Millennium+5 at http://www.ngocongo.org/mdg
_______________________________________________
Plenary mailing list
Plenary@wsis-cs.org
http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/plenary
