IRIS Actions / SMSI / Human Rights / List

[Précédent par date] [Index par date] [Suivant by date] [Précédent par thème] [Index par thème] [Suivant par thème]
[Previous by date] [Index by date] [Next by date] [Previous by thread] [Index by thread] [Next by thread]

Fwd: for information [WSIS CS-Plenary] Nominations: Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG)



Hi all,

I'm forwarding this message from Adam Peake, Internet Governance caucus coordinator, which is self-explanatory, I hope. Unfortunately, I'm very busy those days with my job, but please start discussing this issue inside the HR caucus.

Meryem

Début du message réexpédié :

De: Adam Peake <ajp@glocom.ac.jp>
Date: Mar 7 sep 2004 12:11:37 Europe/Paris
À: rfj@humanrights.dk, marzouki@ras.eu.org
Objet: for information [WSIS CS-Plenary] Nominations: Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG)


Dear Rikke, Meryem:

Just want to make sure that you have seen the announcement about the working group on internet governance and our attempt to develop a nominations process. As you might know (Meryem, I think you are still on the governance caucus list?) it has been difficult to agree on what to do. In the end Jeanette and I decided we must involve all the caucuses and working groups. So we sent an announcement the CS plenary which I am copying below.

So please make sure the human rights caucus sees this. And the draft recommendation on working group structure may be helpful background <http://www.too-much.tv/internet_governance/2004/09/ draft_statement.html>

We really need caucuses to work together on this. People working together to come up with a limited list of nominations rather than many, divergent and oriented only to the interests of the particular caucus/WG. (never happen :-) Kummer and Annan seem to be looking for around 6/7 civil society names, we in WSIS will not be the only source, but if we can present 10-15 strong candidates I think we will have done OK.

Many thanks,

Adam



To: plenary@wsis-cs.org
From: Adam Peake <ajp@glocom.ac.jp>
Cc: governance@lists.cpsr.org
Subject: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Nominations: Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG)
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 10:35:37 +0900


To Members of WSIS Civil Society, Caucuses and Working Groups

The WSIS Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus hopes to assemble a list of candidates for membership in the Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG). The purpose of the list is to give Mr. Kummer and Mr. Annan a set of candidates from which they can select members for the WGIG. This list will not be the only input into the membership decision process, and does not prevent any group or individual from submitting her or his recommendations. We wish to provide the collective recommendations of WSIS caucuses and working groups.

After much deliberation on the process by which the candidate list would be compiled, we, as coordinators of the Internet Governance caucus have made the decision to invite each of the WSIS civil society caucuses and working groups to suggest between one (1) and three (3) names for inclusion on the candidate list.

There is not agreement for this course of action among members of the IG Caucus, but time is pressing and we feel WSIS Civil Society must have an opportunity to participate in this process. This can work if we all try to make it work. It means trying to think what is best for civil society, and not any particular interest group. Please read this note carefully. And refer to the draft statement on structure of the WGIG you can find at this URL <http://www.too-much.tv/internet_governance/> (Spanish, French, English and Portuguese.)

One of the goals for this candidate list is to make sure that all of the topical areas that might be included in the governance debate are covered. Indications are that the WGIG will take a broad view of Internet governance, and issues will include ICANN, Spam, information and network security, privacy and other ICT rights issues, intellectual property rights, and interconnection agreements to name just a few. Asking the other caucuses and working groups for recommendations is considered the best way to make sure that all topics of concern to WSIS civil society are present.

Note that our recommendations about the structure of the WGIG (here <http://www.too-much.tv/internet_governance/>) say we think the group should be small, between 19 and 31 total core members. By asking for nominations from all of WSIS civil society we are inviting a potentially large number of names to be submitted. Some means of reducing the composite list we receive may be required. We look forward to your advice on how we might handle this situation, it is quite likely. We suggest discussions about this are started now on the CS plenary list.

Please attempt to prioritize your nominations. If you are unable to do so please state clearly that your list is not prioritized. Coordination of nominations among caucuses/working group will be very helpful.

Individual members of the CS plenary may also submit nominations. Individuals should submit their nominations based on the criteria explained below.

As background for making the caucus/working group decision on the candidates, a draft of the WSIS Civil Society caucus's contribution on the WGIG can be found online at <http://www.too-much.tv/internet_governance/>. These notes discuss some of the contents of the contribution.

We consider it critical that a balanced WGIG be drawn from a multi dimensional consideration of diversity. That is, diversity in terms of sector, region, gender, and language background, among others, must be considered in assembling the WGIG. It is also important that there be a balance between members from developing and developed countries. It is also considered very important that candidates have a degree of knowledge of the issues, including policy, legal and technical, involved in the Internet governance debate. We also suggest candidates should have experience working in an international committee environment, be aware of ICT for development issues and human rights. No candidate is expected to have all these qualities, but we are suggesting they should be people with broad experience.

It is considered critical that though all participants come from different perspectives, they should be people who are willing to listen and consider carefully the views of others. It is expected that the best outcome for the WGIG will come from an assembly of open minded individuals who can share their knowledge and expertise in an cooperative manner.

Finally it is considered important that any individual nominated as a candidate understand the amount of work this assignment would involve and indicate a readiness to participate. While the work plan of the WGIG has yet to be determined, it is expected that the WGIG will begin work in the final months of 2004 and finish by July 2005. The schedule will most probably involve, email discussions, teleconferences and up to four (4) face to face meetings. We anticipate that the working language of the WGIG itself will be English. It is expected, however, that there will be a great sensitivity to language issues as the WGIG conducts its work and consultations.

In making your caucuses/working groups recommendation, we request that you submit the following information, which will be passed on to Mr. Kummer, with the names of the candidates:

- Reliable contact information for the candidate; i.e. email, telephone, fax and postal address.

- A statement indicating the qualities that the person would bring to the WGIG. While no particular content is being required, it is recommended that this section include a discussion of the concerns mentioned above and a discussion of the experience and perspective the candidate would bring to the WGIG discussions.

- A statement of the person's governance related affiliations. That is information such as: which sector does the person belong to (government, industry or civil society), what caucuses/working groups do they participate in, employer, national background, and language skills.

- An indication from the candidate that they understand the work load they are volunteering for and that they are available during the expected period of deliberations.

- A short statement about your caucus/working group. Include information about the group's background and history, membership (numbers), and achievements or other information you think relevant. Please give a URL for a website if you have one.

It is recommended that these statements be no more then two pages in length. Candidate information will be collated and published on the Internet <http://www.too-much.tv/internet_governance/> (with candidates personal contact information removed.)

Members of the Internet governance caucus will aggregate the names received and send them along with the name of the caucus/working groups that made the nomination to Markus Kummer. If any reconsideration of names is required in light of issues arising from the WGIG consultation on September 20-21 we will hold any relevant discussions about this on the plenary mailing list.

Time is short on gathering the list of candidates and you are requested to submit the candidate statements within the next two weeks. The deadline for submission of candidate statements is 20 Sept, 2004. All statements should be sent to:

igov@tla.crepundia.net

In concluding, we thank you for helping us complete this important task.

Please try to coordinate your nominations with other caucuses and working groups. And please consider the qualities your nominations will bring to the WGIG carefully. If you have questions about the process please contact the coordinators of the Caucus:

Jeanette Hofmann and Adam Peake
Coordinators, Internet Governance Caucus
____________________________________