[Précédent par date]
[Index par date]
[Suivant by date]
[Précédent par thème]
[Index par thème]
[Suivant par thème]
[Previous by date]
[Index by date]
[Next by date]
[Previous by thread]
[Index by thread]
[Next by thread]
Fwd: [WSIS CS-Plenary] ICANN and the public interest issue in CS priority document
Début du message réexpédié :
> De: nnenna nwakanma <nne75@yahoo.com>
> Date: Lun 14 juil 2003 13:02:48 Europe/Paris
> À: plenary@wsis-cs.org, ct@wsis-cs.org, hr-wsis@iris.sgdg.org,
> governance@lists.cpsr.org
> Objet: Rép : [WSIS CS-Plenary] ICANN and the public interest issue in
> CS priority document
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have followed this ICANN debate long before now. Here are my
> feelings on:
>
> "To these ends, the current management of Internet names and numbers
> and other related mechanisms should be re-examined with the
> full participation of all stakeholders in light of serving
> public interests and compatibility with human rights standards."
> 1.I agree that ICANN is not the best, but let us be shown a BETTER
> option than ICANN. I have been waiting for that solution before
> adding my voice0
> 2. Are we throwing ICANN away with "other related mechanisms"? This
> will mean Internet governance blackout. And when it comes to this, we
> can be sure that something more horrible than ICANN can take its > place.
> 3. Why not add "with full participation of all stakeholders, with a
> strong emphasis on CSOs"?
> 4. Or better still say " re-examined, with the aim of replacing with
> a better management"?
>
> Thx to all
>
> Nnenna
>
>
>
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
