IRIS Actions / SMSI / Human Rights / List

[Précédent par date] [Index par date] [Suivant by date] [Précédent par thème] [Index par thème] [Suivant par thème]
[Previous by date] [Index by date] [Next by date] [Previous by thread] [Index by thread] [Next by thread]

HR caucus and post-wsis actions lines



Hi again,

Besides the IGF, which is a very important process, we should also step into the implementation and follow-up of WSIS actions lines. These actions lines, together with the relevant UN agency to take the lead on their implementation, are identified in the annex of the "Tunis Agenda for the Information Society", available in different languages at: http://www.itu.int/wsis/documents/doc_multi.asp? lang=en&id=2267|0 (go to the Annex at the end of the document).

ITU has started first discussions on action line C2 (infrastructure), for example, during a meeting it held recently in Doha (Qatar), taking the opportunity of one of its conferences (World Telecommunication Development Conference - WTDC). As a matter of fact, Anriette Esterhuysen has sent a letter to ITU Secretary General on behalf of APC, that she reproduced on the plenary list. APC was mainly raising the issue of CS participation to such meetings held in different parts of the world, where almost only some governements and ITU private sector members can attend.
I don't know if there are other consultations that have started.


My point here is to suggest that, according to the competence and specificities of members of our caucus, we share the work among us and we try to have caucus members in charge of closely following some issues/actions lines, and reporting to the caucus so that we can develop positions and hopefully participate to a large range of actions lines follow-up.
Typically, Ginger (from UNA Venezuela) has many times expressed her concerns with the e-voting issue. I know that another caucus member, CPSR (represented here by Bill), is also working on e-voting. This would be a good start to follow action line C7 (ICT applications), and specially e-government. We can certainly identify other members who would be ready to follow other actions lines.


At the global level, you may have noticed that there is no "human rights" action line (we have rather an "Ethical dimensions of the Information Society", C10... when you don't want to talk about rights, call them "ethics"!!!), and among the more than 15 UN commissions or agencies respectively in charge of their implementation and follow-up, one is strangely (?) missing: the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Righst (OHCHR)!

I really think this deserves an intervention from us, with e.g. a letter to the UN Secretary General and to the High Commissioner for Human Rights, deploring this situation and asking for HR explicitly appearing and highlighted.

Waiting for your comments,
Meryem