IRIS Actions / SMSI / Human Rights / List

[Précédent par date] [Index par date] [Suivant by date] [Précédent par thème] [Index par thème] [Suivant par thème]
[Previous by date] [Index by date] [Next by date] [Previous by thread] [Index by thread] [Next by thread]

Re: [hr-wsis] FYI - Criticism of Tunisia Not Allowed At UN Meeting



Dear colleagues,

I am of the view that this is one of those scenarios that was blown out of proportion by the secretariat and the Tunisian government which should have just been allowed on the table and it would have quietly been received by various governments. Instead they have made an incident of it and they must live with the consequences.

Nevertheless, it is concommitant on us to try and understand by what rules we are to abide by in the process. As I understand it, under UN rules there may be a restriction on documents that single out a single government for criticism. IF this is the case, then we need to know if it is acceptable to submit documents that criticize 5 governments, or 150 governments, etc.

As a matter of fairness and balance, it would be good if our documents began with the proviso that many governments have poor records on human rights in the information society, and highlight several of them, with some attention to regional balance and several aggregious cases. It is my understanding that many of our African colleagues in civil society have problems with the singling out of one African country, which need to be taken into account, particularly if a majority of members of the caucus come from Western countries.

Regards,

Rik Panganiban

On Feb 25, 2005, at 4:51 AM, Meryem Marzouki wrote:

Criticism of Tunisia Not Allowed At UN Meeting
http://allafrica.com/stories/200502240550.html

Highway Africa News Agency  (Grahamstown)

 February 24, 2005
Posted to the web February 24, 2005
Angella Nabwowe
  Geneva

The Secretariat of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) will not allow civil society to distribute a report at the PrepCom 2 meeting currently taking place in Geneva, Switzerland.

The sixty page report, compiled by the IFEX Tunisia Monitoring group, is critical of human rights abuses in Tunisia, the country designated to host the second phase of WSIS in November this year. The report details the imprisonment of individuals, the blocking of news and information websites, police surveillance of emails and internet cafes, lack of pluralism and media censorship.

IFEX is an international consortium of media organisations that campaign for the freedom of expression and against human rights abuses.

During a media caucus meeting this evening, Steve Buckley, world president of the World Association of Community Broadcasters (AMARC) informed stakeholders that the WSIS secretariat had banned them from distributing the document in any meetings or rooms except the one assigned for the civil society plenary.

"They want us to sign a statement saying that we shall not distribute the report in any of the desginated conference venues except civil society. They maintain IFEX is not accredited, but IFEX is not an organisation -- it is a consortium of organisations accredited by the WSIS" Buckley reported.

Buckley views the banning as double standards because the response from the Tunisian pro-government delegation criticising the IFEX report is being circulated as an official document at the conference.

"This is a delaying move. If we don't get a response from the secretariat by tomorrow, we shall be left with no choice but to give the WSIS secretariat a deadline to have the report distributed because it was submitted to them with a covering letter with the five organisations that compiled the report and are accredited by WSIS".

He says that delaying the distribution of the report is typical of the Tunisian censorship techniques.

According to Article 13 of the Tunisian press code, a declaration must be lodged with the ministry of the interior before the publication of any periodical. In exchange, the ministry must hand out a "récépissé" (receipt). The declaration must include: The title of the periodical, the details of the publisher, the details of the printer, the language(s) in which it is drafted. By virtue of Article 14, before the printing of any periodical, the printer requires the receipt delivered by the ministry of the interior. In practice the receipt is almost never issued, thus preventing the creation of a certain number of periodicals in Tunisia.

Mark Bench, executive director WPFC refers to the situation as government censorship made possible by the United Nations. "I understand there was a rule at UN that if a government wishes to block any communication of an NGO, they may do so because who are we? However, coming from a country where one can say whatever they want, because this is guaranteed in the constitution, we find that this is government censorship here at the UN. We are accredited, why can we not say what we want to?"

Luckson Chipare, regional director of the Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA) who presented the IFEX report to the conference on yesterday, says "We are registered to be here, when we were printing the report they didn't inform us of a second decision of whether or not to have the report circulated."

--
Working List of the WSIS Human Rights Caucus
Web site : http://www.iris.sgdg.org/actions/smsi/hr-wsis
Public Archives: http://www.iris.sgdg.org/actions/smsi/hr-wsis/list
To post a message to the list, send an email to: hr-wsis@iris.sgdg.org
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send an email to: Meryem.Marzouki@iris.sgdg.org