IRIS Actions / SMSI / Human Rights / List

[Précédent par date] [Index par date] [Suivant by date] [Précédent par thème] [Index par thème] [Suivant par thème]
[Previous by date] [Index by date] [Next by date] [Previous by thread] [Index by thread] [Next by thread]

A19 statement on RtoC



12 February 2003 - for immediate release

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IS CENTRAL TO THE RIGHT TO COMMUNICATE

ARTICLE 19 today released a statement on the right to communicate, stressing
that it should be understood as "the right of every individual or community
to have its stories and views heard."1

The Statement notes that the right to communicate should not be conceived of
as a new and independent right. Instead, any Declaration on the Right to
Communicate should firmly establish it within the framework of existing
rights, most importantly the right to freedom of expression.

According to ARTICLE 19, the right to communicate should be seen as an
umbrella or framework term, encompassing within it a group of related rights
including:

* the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas;
* the right to pluralism within the media and to equitable access to
the means of communication;
* the right to practice and express one's culture;
* the right to participate in public decision-making processes;
* the right to access information from public bodies; and
* supporting rights including the right to communicate anonymously and
the right to respect for private life.

Understood in this way, a Declaration on the Right to Communicate would make
a significant contribution to the ongoing process of implementation of the
International Bill of Rights.

However, we have serious concerns about the draft Declaration on the Right
to Communicate circulated by Cees Hamelink in December 2002.3 This draft
Declaration seeks to impose a number of vague, broad restrictions on the
right to freedom of expression, contrary to international law. Equally
seriously, it fails to elaborate clearly the implications of the right to
communicate and what States need to do to respect this right. ARTICLE 19
urges NGOs to resist inclusion in any Declaration of many of the provisions
of the Hamelink Declaration, which undermine rather than promote the further
realisation of human rights.

ENDS

Notes to editors:

1. The statement can be found on ARTICLE 19's website, at
<
http://www.article19.org/docimages/1511.doc>
http://www.article19.org/docimages/1511.doc.
2. An important debate is taking place over whether the World Summit on
the Information Society (WSIS), a UN/ITU sponsored global forum which is to
take place in two stages between 2003 and 2005, should adopt a declaration
on the right to communicate.
3. An analysis of the Hamelink draft can be found on the ARTICLE 19
website, at  <
http://www.article19.org/docimages/1502.doc>
http://www.article19.org/docimages/1502.doc.
4. For further information contact Toby Mendel, Director of the Law
Programme, on + 1 902 431 3688, email:  <
mailto:toby@article19.org>
Toby@article19.org, or Peter Noorlander, Legal Officer, on + 44 20 7278
9292, email:  <
mailto:Peter@article19.org> Peter@article19.org.